Skip to main content

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Jan. 27 that the primary purpose test will be used to interpret attorney-client privilege.

When attorneys confer with clients for the dual-purposes of legal and business advice, courts will decide if the communication is confidential by finding the primary purpose of the communication. If the primary purpose is to give or receive business advice, the communication would not be protected. If the primary purpose is to give or receive legal advice, the communication would be protected.

Previously, district courts in the Ninth Circuit would use either the primary purpose test, or the “because of” test, according to the ruling. In the “because of” test, the

Want to Read More?

Subscribe for free to get access to all of Follow Our Courts’ content.

LoginSubscribe

Topics to follow


            

            

                        
assignment_turned_in Registrations

    
     
   

Subscribe now for free

Follow Our Courts will never charge for access to our content, and we will not sell your information.

Password must be at least 7 characters long.
Password must be at least 7 characters long.
Please login to view this page.
Please login to view this page.
Please login to view this page.