Justice is defined as the “administration of what is morally right and good.” As it involves racial justice, at times we may witness something in society that may seem morally wrong, but it’s a separate question as to whether it will be legally wrong. To be fair, they should be separate questions; just because something seems morally wrong does not mean that it automatically should be judged legally wrong. We should not convict someone or find someone legally liable because we feel like it. In court, there are standards evidence must meet in order to be used toward the final outcome; issues like hearsay keep evidence from coming in that may be compelling, but is not trustworthy (more prejudicial than probative). There
Related Posts
School says anti-transgender athlete case has no legs
Riverside Unified School District has asked to dismiss the lawsuit over the inclusion of a transgender athlete in a high school race. The plaintiffs’ complaint did not prove any damage…

Aidan McGloinMarch 3, 2025
Automotive/TransportationCasesCivilCivil RightsCorporateEmploymentEnvironmentGovernmentImmigrationLaw enforcementMilitaryPersonal InjuryRetail & E-CommerceRoundup 
Federal civil case filings Feb. 28
Public entity Western Municipal Water District v. The 3M Co. (5:25-cv-00493): tort product liability. California Central District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. presides.The public water district serves 25,000 connections from Corona…

Aidan McGloinFebruary 28, 2025
CA Supreme Court to consider Constitutionality of electronic recording ban
The California Supreme Court accepted on Feb. 21 a challenge to the state’s limits on audio recordings in the courtroom. The law already allows for audio recordings if an official…

Aidan McGloinFebruary 25, 2025