Justice is defined as the “administration of what is morally right and good.” As it involves racial justice, at times we may witness something in society that may seem morally wrong, but it’s a separate question as to whether it will be legally wrong. To be fair, they should be separate questions; just because something seems morally wrong does not mean that it automatically should be judged legally wrong. We should not convict someone or find someone legally liable because we feel like it. In court, there are standards evidence must meet in order to be used toward the final outcome; issues like hearsay keep evidence from coming in that may be compelling, but is not trustworthy (more prejudicial than probative). There
Related Posts
AppellateCasesCriminalLaw enforcement
Split appellate ruling invalidates SB sheriff’s gun arrest
A San Bernardino Sheriff deputy’s finding of a firearm in a felon’s car was invalidated May 2 by a split appellate ruling in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. The…
Aidan McGloinMay 2, 2024
CaliforniaCourthouse HappeningsGovernmentLegal IndustryLegislationTechnology
Online citation payment available in Riverside County
Riverside Superior Court joins other courts in offering online citation payment. MyCitations will allow people to also ask for a reduction due to inability to pay, payment plans, extensions and…
Aidan McGloinApril 26, 2024
Automotive/TransportationCaliforniaCasesCivilCivil RightsComplianceConsumer ProtectionCorporateFinanceGovernmentHealthLaw enforcementPersonal Injury
Federal case filings April 26
Angela Corona v. State of California (5:24-cv-00883): Civil Rights Act. California Central District Judge Dean Pregerson presides.Nine former inmates, some of whom were incarcerated at the California Institute for Women…
Aidan McGloinApril 26, 2024