Skip to main content

Dismissing a whole petition for custody because an attorney neglected to provide a witness list is too extreme, the Court of Appeal ruled Sept. 12.

In this case, Elouise Harber and Delores Williams, the maternal and paternal grandmothers of two children, filed competing petitions to gain custody over two of their grandchildren. Harber’s counsel neglected to file a witness list; Harber was going to be the only witness, and the attorney did not believe the requirement applied to party witnesses, according to the appellate ruling.

San Bernardino Superior Court dismissed Harber’s case because of the missing witness list.

The Court of Appeal disagreed. Because it was her attorney’s fault,

Want to Read More?

Subscribe for free to get access to all of Follow Our Courts’ content.

LoginSubscribe

Topics to follow


            

            

                        
assignment_turned_in Registrations

    
     
   

Subscribe now for free

Follow Our Courts will never charge for access to our content, and we will not sell your information.

Password must be at least 7 characters long.
Password must be at least 7 characters long.
Please login to view this page.
Please login to view this page.
Please login to view this page.